Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

5-amino-1MQ in biological ageing and healthspan endpoints — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of 5-amino-1MQ for biological ageing and healthspan endpoints, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-047/EV-LONGEVITY
Series
Evidence extract
Version
4.0
Published
07 Jul 2025
Last reviewed
07 Dec 2025
Next review
07 Dec 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.47
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2025 Q3

§1Evidence extract: Biological ageing and healthspan endpoints

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Interventions proposed to modify rate of biological ageing, assessed by composite biomarker clocks, functional measures, or mortality.
Intervention
5-amino-1MQ, oral and intraperitoneal in preclinical studies; oral in research contexts
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Epigenetic age acceleration

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Frailty index; Functional capacity; All-cause mortality.

§1.2Contributing trials

No trial has been identified for 5-amino-1MQ in biological ageing and healthspan endpoints. The rating below reflects that absence.

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasno downgradeInconsistencydowngrade one levelIndirectnessdowngrade one levelImprecisionno downgradePublication biasdowngrade one levelTotal downgrading: 3 levelsVery low certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for 5-amino-1MQ in biological ageing and healthspan endpoints. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
InconsistencySeriousDirection is consistent; magnitude varies with the intensity of the background intervention.
IndirectnessSeriousThe enrolled population differs materially from the population of the assessment question.
ImprecisionNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Publication biasSeriousToo few contributing studies for a formal assessment; the risk cannot be excluded.
Overall rating: Very low certainty. The Institute has very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate. In this series a very low rating most often reflects an absence of controlled human evidence rather than conflicting evidence.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Lee C, Zeng J, Drew BG, Sallam T, Martin-Montalvo A, Wan J, Kim SJ, Mehta H, Hevener AL, de Cabo R, Cohen P. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metabolism 2015;21(3):443–454. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.009 · PMID 25738459
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q3C(R9) Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2024;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH M7(R2) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.