Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · evidence extract

Dulaglutide in chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes — evidence extract

The Institute's graded assessment of Dulaglutide for chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-008/EV-CKD
Series
Evidence extract
Version
3.1
Published
23 Jul 2024
Last reviewed
23 Sep 2025
Next review
23 Sep 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.8
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2024 Q3

§1Evidence extract: Chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes

§1.1Question and anchor outcome

Population
Persistent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate or persistent albuminuria in the context of type 2 diabetes, staged by eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Intervention
Dulaglutide, subcutaneous once weekly
Comparator
As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
Anchor outcome
Composite kidney outcome (kidney failure, sustained ≥50 % eGFR decline, kidney or cardiovascular death)

Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Annual eGFR slope; Change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

§1.2Contributing trials

Table 1. Trials contributing to the assessment of Dulaglutide in chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes.

TrialPhaseDesignRandomisedDurationYear
AWARD-73Randomised, open-label, active-controlled57652 weeks2018

§1.3Certainty assessment

Certainty assessment by domainDowngrading decision recorded for each certainty domain.Certainty domainNo concernSeriousVery seriousEffect on ratingRisk of biasno downgradeInconsistencydowngrade two levelsIndirectnessno downgradeImprecisionno downgradePublication biasno downgradeTotal downgrading: 2 levelsLow certainty
Figure 2. Domain-by-domain certainty assessment for Dulaglutide in chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. The starting rating for a body of randomised evidence is high; each serious concern reduces it by one level and each very serious concern by two.

Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.

DomainRatingReasoning
Risk of biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
InconsistencyVery seriousEstimates vary in magnitude across contributing trials beyond what chance would produce.
IndirectnessNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
ImprecisionNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Publication biasNo concernNo serious concern identified in this domain.
Overall rating: Low certainty. Confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate.

§1.4What this extract does not establish

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Riesmeyer JS, Riddle MC, Rydén L, Xavier D, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Rao-Melacini P, Wong G, Avezum A, Basile J, Chung N, Conget I. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet 2019;394(10193):121–130. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3 · PMID 31189511
  2. Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, Viljoen A. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2018;6(4):275–286. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X · PMID 29397376
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.