Epithalon in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy — evidence extract
The Institute's graded assessment of Epithalon for immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy, with the contributing trials and the domain-by-domain certainty reasoning.
§1Evidence extract: Immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy
§1.1Question and anchor outcome
- Population
- Pharmacological modification of innate or adaptive immune function, assessed by cell counts, functional assays and clinical infection or oncological endpoints.
- Intervention
- Epithalon, subcutaneous, intramuscular or intranasal in research contexts
- Comparator
- As used in each contributing trial; reported per trial rather than pooled across comparator types
- Anchor outcome
- CD4 and CD8 counts
Additional outcomes the Institute extracts for this indication: Response to vaccination; Infection incidence; Tumour response where applicable.
§1.2Contributing trials
No trial has been identified for Epithalon in immune modulation and adjunctive immunotherapy. The rating below reflects that absence.
§1.3Certainty assessment
Table 2. Reasoning recorded against each certainty domain.
| Domain | Rating | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of bias | Serious | Allocation concealment is not described in one contributing report. |
| Inconsistency | Serious | Estimates vary in magnitude across contributing trials beyond what chance would produce. |
| Indirectness | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Imprecision | Serious | The confidence interval spans values that would support different decisions. |
| Publication bias | No concern | No serious concern identified in this domain. |
| Overall rating: Very low certainty. The Institute has very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate. In this series a very low rating most often reflects an absence of controlled human evidence rather than conflicting evidence. | ||
§1.4What this extract does not establish
References cited on this page
References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.
- Khavinson VK, Kuznik BI, Tarnovskaya SI, Linkova NS. Peptides and CCL11 and HMGB1 as differently expressed age-dependent proinflammatory biomarkers of ageing. Advances in Gerontology 2020;10(1):1–8. doi:10.1134/S2079057020010063
- D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · PMID 33782057
Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.