Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 4

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

735 documents · page 4 of 25

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/009Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Abimbola Sotomayor-EkwuemeThe standard specifies how to test a unit and not which units to test
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/010Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsProfessor Bartolomeu Nkosi-LindegaardNothing requires the report to state who performed the determination
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/011Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Melisande Thorsby-NakamuraThe reporting threshold is not tied to a demonstrated limit of quantitation
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/001Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Rosalind PetrossianA printed copy loses the document identifier
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/002Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Hyacinth Drakeford-AmadiA printed copy loses the information that makes it checkable
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/005Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesQuentin Whitmarsh-ObiThe registry is published only as pages and not in a form that can be processed
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/006Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesYolanda Norrington-BhattA figure carries information that appears nowhere in text
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/007Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesThaddeus Isaksen-BalogunThe same quantity is rounded differently in two parts of one document
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/008Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Anselm Thorsby-NakamuraA field the Institute could not verify should be shown rather than omitted
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/001Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/003Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Evander Ashworth-DanquahAn indirect comparison is presented without an assessment of transitivity
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/004Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/006Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Odalys Thorsby-NakamuraAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/010Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunOverlapping primary studies across included reviews are counted more than once
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/011Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Yusuf Whitmarsh-ObiRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/014Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Theodora IngelbrechtDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/003Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Yaa KettlewellIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/004Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/006Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Oisín RautavaaraThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/007Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/002Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Vittoria QuintanilhaAttrition is assessed in the risk-of-bias domains and not reported as a number
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/006Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Evander Ashworth-DanquahThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/009Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergThe conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/011Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Yusuf Whitmarsh-ObiResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/012Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunA single-trial result is presented in the visual form of a pooled estimate
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/013Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Delphine TrelawneyThe comparator was given at a dose below the one in general use
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/014Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationThaddeus Isaksen-BalogunA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/015Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Oisín RautavaaraStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/001Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human…Dr Ivo QuintanilhaThe conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports
DRAFT-THYROID-C-CE/007Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human…Dr Yusuf Whitmarsh-ObiAttrition is assessed in the risk-of-bias domains and not reported as a number

page 4 of 25

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.