Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions noted, no amendment

The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.

Submissions

127 documents · page 1 of 5

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/008Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Vasilisa ImmelmannThe document should describe how an assessment becomes a decision
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/005Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Oswin YorkstoneDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-FR/011Draft revision of the Institute’s certainty assessment framework…Dr Anselm Ashworth-DanquahA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-RUB/008Draft supplier evaluation rubricDr Rurik Underhill-OkaforA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/007Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3Dr Dmitri NordhagenA sortable table implies a comparison the underlying data do not support
DRAFT-SEMAGLUTIDE-/006Draft monograph: semaglutide, version 3Dr Jolyon Grünbaum-SowandeA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/008Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Liesbeth QuennevilleDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/011Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Hortensia HollingworthThe monograph should not describe how the compound is supplied outside a regulated route
DRAFT-TIRZEPATIDE-/001Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2Dr Rukayat Zaleski-MbekiA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-WEIGHT-REGAI/009Draft synthesis: weight change after discontinuation of an incretin…Dr Eamon Sandringham-AduBaseline imbalance in a small contributing trial is not remarked on
DRAFT-NETWORK-TRAN/005Draft methodological review: transitivity in the incretin networkDr Quintus RautavaaraDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/009Draft conflicts-of-interest policyDr Rukayat Zaleski-MbekiThe Institute publishes no telephone number and no messaging channel
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/004Draft conflicts-of-interest policyDr Wolfram Kaltenbach-MensahDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/006Draft funding and sponsorship policyDr Kamila Glendinning-UcheDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/009Draft funding and sponsorship policyLudmila BrackenridgeA sortable table implies a comparison the underlying data do not support
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/005Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Amara QuaresmaDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/010Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Georgiana ZimmerthalA sortable table implies a comparison the underlying data do not support
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/012Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsDr Sigrún Lavrentiev industryThe disclosure requirements exceed those of comparable bodies
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/011Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme recordsRadoslava Palmgren-KofiA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/005Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentationsDr Adaeze Dunmore-EkpoA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-ANALYTICAL-S/006Draft scope of the analytical and methodological standards seriesDr Mordecai Bellingham-OjoA multi-part document does not indicate how many parts it has
DRAFT-GLP1-OBESITY/011Draft synthesis: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight…Dr Ivo QuintanilhaDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-LEAN-MASS-SC/005Draft scoping review: change in lean mass during pharmacologically…Dr Jolyon Grünbaum-SowandeBaseline imbalance in a small contributing trial is not remarked on
DRAFT-GASTROPARESI/011Draft safety review: delayed gastric emptying and procedural sedationDr Katarzyna Oppenheimer-AdeBaseline imbalance in a small contributing trial is not remarked on
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-DOS/009Draft format of the supplier dossier seriesLudmila BrackenridgeA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-DOS/006Draft format of the supplier dossier seriesDr Kamila Glendinning-UcheDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate page
DRAFT-SUPPLIER-DOS/007Draft format of the supplier dossier seriesDr Wilhelmina WintringhamA multi-part document does not indicate how many parts it has
DRAFT-PEOPLE-REGIS/005Draft policy on the register of members and reviewersValentin TollemacheThe Institute publishes no telephone number and no messaging channel
DRAFT-PEOPLE-REGIS/003Draft policy on the register of members and reviewersDr Hyacinth Drakeford-AmadiA sortable table implies a comparison the underlying data do not support
DRAFT-PEOPLE-REGIS/001Draft policy on the register of members and reviewersDr Zdenka Nyquist-ObioraA superseded version should remain reachable from the version that replaced it

page 1 of 5

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.