Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · Compound monograph

Draft monograph: amycretin

Consultation on the draft monograph for amycretin, a co-agonist at the glucagon-like peptide-1 and amylin receptors. The draft grades the principal assessed outcome at low certainty on the basis of early-phase evidence, and records that no phase 3 outcome…

Document identifier
CEI-CP-039
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
05 Aug 2026
Last reviewed
05 Aug 2026
Next review
05 Aug 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.39
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2026 Q3
Window
05 Aug 2026 – 02 Sep 2026
Status
Open
Submissions
16

§1Consultation and window

§1.1Window

Opened
5 August 2026
Closed
2 September 2026
Duration
28 days
Status
Open — submissions are being received
Document under consultation
Monograph: Amycretin
Submissions received
16

§1.2Consultation questions

The secretariat put the following questions. A submission was not required to address them and several did not; the questions record what the Institute was uncertain about rather than restricting what a respondent could raise.

  1. Is the low certainty rating correctly drawn, and is the maturity of the contributing evidence stated on the face of the rating?
  2. Is the amylin component of the mechanism described in a way that distinguishes it from the amylin analogue monographs in the same series?
  3. Are the evidence gaps recorded in the draft complete?

§1.3How a submission is handled

  • Every submission is signed. The Institute publishes no anonymous submission.
  • Every submission carries a declared interest. A declaration of no interest is itself a declaration and is recorded as one. A declaration is not a disqualification and the Institute has never given a submission less weight on that ground.
  • A submission from an employee of a marketing-authorisation holder is identified as an industry submission on its face, following a unanimous consultation on the conflicts policy.
  • Every submission receives a secretariat response and a disposition. Submissions that are not accepted remain published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.
  • There is no voting, no reputation score, no reply thread and no editing after receipt.

§1.4Making a submission

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.