Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · Evidence synthesis

Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin receptor agonists

Consultation on the draft of this safety review, which registers the question: What is the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and of discontinuation for adverse events with incretin receptor agonists compared with placebo?

Document identifier
CEI-CP-100
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
29 Mar 2025
Last reviewed
29 Mar 2025
Next review
29 Mar 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.100
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2025 Q1
Window
24 Jan 2025 – 21 Feb 2025
Status
Closed
Submissions
12

§1Consultation and window

§1.1Window

Opened
24 January 2025
Closed
21 February 2025
Duration
28 days
Status
Closed — the disposition is published
Document under consultation
Synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin receptor agonists
Submissions received
12

§1.2Consultation questions

The secretariat put the following questions. A submission was not required to address them and several did not; the questions record what the Institute was uncertain about rather than restricting what a respondent could raise.

  1. Is the high certainty rating for the anchor outcome correctly drawn from the contributing evidence?
  2. Is any eligible study missing from the included set, and is any included study ineligible under the registered criteria?
  3. Are the limitations recorded in the abstract sufficient, and is any material limitation omitted?

§1.3How a submission is handled

  • Every submission is signed. The Institute publishes no anonymous submission.
  • Every submission carries a declared interest. A declaration of no interest is itself a declaration and is recorded as one. A declaration is not a disqualification and the Institute has never given a submission less weight on that ground.
  • A submission from an employee of a marketing-authorisation holder is identified as an industry submission on its face, following a unanimous consultation on the conflicts policy.
  • Every submission receives a secretariat response and a disposition. Submissions that are not accepted remain published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.
  • There is no voting, no reputation score, no reply thread and no editing after receipt.

§1.4Outcome

Amendments arising were applied and are recorded in the review's amendment log, each traceable to a numbered submission.

The disposition table, listing each submission with its disposition and the resulting amendment, is at §3.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.