Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · §3

Draft monograph: Gonadorelin — disposition

The disposition of every submission and the amendments that resulted.

Document identifier
CEI-CP-054/3
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
08 Sep 2024
Last reviewed
08 Sep 2024
Next review
08 Sep 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.54
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2024 Q3
Window
29 Jul 2024 – 28 Aug 2024
Status
Closed
Submissions
9

§3Disposition and amendments

§3.1Disposition table

Table 1. Every submission with its disposition. Each row links to the submission in full.

ReferenceRespondentPoint raisedDisposition
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/001Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergTrials are described as terminated where they completed as plannedAccepted in part
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/002Quentin Whitmarsh-ObiThe compound is supplied under names the monograph does not listAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/003Dr Rurik Haverkamp-DialloDeclared interests should appear on the document rather than on a separate pageNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/004Dr Zdenka XimenesThe absence of a rare harm in the trial set is presented as reassuranceAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/005Dr Fenella LavrentievThe difference between pulsatile and continuous administration is not addressedAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/006Dr Eamon ImmelmannA purity figure from a certificate is quoted as though it were a content figureAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/007Dr Quentin ZimmerthalThe monograph does not tell a reader that a stated mass may be substantially counter-ion and waterAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/008Dr Abimbola Sotomayor-EkwuemeThe route of administration studied is not the route in which the compound is suppliedAccepted
DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/009Dr Ivo QuintanilhaEvery contributing trial shares one sponsor and the monograph does not say soAccepted
9 submissions in total.

§3.2Summary by disposition

Table 2. Counts by disposition, with the meaning of each.

DispositionCountMeaning
Accepted7The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Accepted in part1Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Noted, no amendment1The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.
Not accepted0The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

§3.3Resulting amendments

  1. Trials are described as terminated where they completed as planned — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/001. Trial status now uses a fixed vocabulary defined in the glossary, and where the reason for stopping is not evidenced by a document the Institute holds, the status is recorded as stopped with the reason not established rather than assigned.
  2. The compound is supplied under names the monograph does not list — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/002. The synonym list is extended to include every name the Institute can evidence from a document it holds, each recorded with its source. Names asserted without a supporting document are not added, and the distinction is stated at the head of the list.
  3. The absence of a rare harm in the trial set is presented as reassurance — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/004. Wherever the monograph reports that an event was not observed, it now states the total exposure and the frequency the contributing trials could have detected, so that the absence is read as the limit of the evidence rather than as a finding.
  4. The difference between pulsatile and continuous administration is not addressed — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/005. The administration schedule is now stated with every effect estimate for these compounds, and the pharmacology section describes the dependence of direction on schedule.
  5. A purity figure from a certificate is quoted as though it were a content figure — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/006. Purity and content are now reported in separate rows with separate definitions, and the monograph states that a purity figure sets no bound on content and that a content figure requires a determination against a standard of assigned content.
  6. The monograph does not tell a reader that a stated mass may be substantially counter-ion and water — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/007. The monograph now states, at the point where vial contents are first mentioned, that a mass figure is uninterpretable unless it states whether it is peptide content or total solids, and cross-references the content standard in the analytical series.
  7. The route of administration studied is not the route in which the compound is supplied — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/008. The assessed-outcome table now carries the studied route in every row, and a standing note appears wherever the supplied presentation differs from it.
  8. Every contributing trial shares one sponsor and the monograph does not say so — arising from DRAFT-GONADORELIN-/009. Sponsor concentration is now stated with the certainty rating, and the monograph records how many independent sponsors contributed evidence to each assessed outcome.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.