Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · Compound monograph

Draft monograph: orforglipron

Consultation on the draft monograph for orforglipron, an oral non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. The draft assesses a compound whose phase 3 programme was reporting during the consultation window, and grades the principal assessed outcome…

Document identifier
CEI-CP-030
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
06 Jul 2026
Last reviewed
06 Jul 2026
Next review
06 Jul 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.30
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2026 Q2
Window
13 Apr 2026 – 12 Jun 2026
Status
Closed
Submissions
10

§1Consultation and window

§1.1Window

Opened
13 April 2026
Closed
12 June 2026
Duration
60 days
Status
Closed — the disposition is published
Document under consultation
Monograph: Orforglipron
Submissions received
10

§1.2Consultation questions

The secretariat put the following questions. A submission was not required to address them and several did not; the questions record what the Institute was uncertain about rather than restricting what a respondent could raise.

  1. Is the moderate certainty rating correctly drawn given the maturity of the contributing evidence at the search date?
  2. Is the distinction between a peptide agonist and a non-peptide small-molecule agonist drawn clearly enough for a reader applying the analytical section?
  3. Are the evidence gaps recorded in the monograph complete, in particular in relation to outcomes beyond weight and glycaemia?

§1.3How a submission is handled

  • Every submission is signed. The Institute publishes no anonymous submission.
  • Every submission carries a declared interest. A declaration of no interest is itself a declaration and is recorded as one. A declaration is not a disqualification and the Institute has never given a submission less weight on that ground.
  • A submission from an employee of a marketing-authorisation holder is identified as an industry submission on its face, following a unanimous consultation on the conflicts policy.
  • Every submission receives a secretariat response and a disposition. Submissions that are not accepted remain published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.
  • There is no voting, no reputation score, no reply thread and no editing after receipt.

§1.4Outcome

The monograph was amended before ratification. The analytical section now states that the peptide standards in the Institute series do not apply to a non-peptide small molecule and directs the reader to the relevant small-molecule methods, and the search date is stated on the face of the certainty rating.

The disposition table, listing each submission with its disposition and the resulting amendment, is at §3.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.