Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · Compound monograph

Draft monograph: tirzepatide, version 2

Consultation on the second version of the tirzepatide monograph, which incorporates the obesity evidence from SURMOUNT-1, reported in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022, the withdrawal evidence from SURMOUNT-4, reported in JAMA in 2024, and the…

Document identifier
CEI-CP-006
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
02 Jul 2025
Last reviewed
02 Jul 2025
Next review
02 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.6
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2025 Q2
Window
03 May 2025 – 31 May 2025
Status
Closed
Submissions
15

§1Consultation and window

§1.1Window

Opened
3 May 2025
Closed
31 May 2025
Duration
28 days
Status
Closed — the disposition is published
Document under consultation
Monograph: Tirzepatide
Submissions received
15

§1.2Consultation questions

The secretariat put the following questions. A submission was not required to address them and several did not; the questions record what the Institute was uncertain about rather than restricting what a respondent could raise.

  1. Is the certainty rating for the weight-reduction outcome correctly drawn from the contributing SURMOUNT trials?
  2. Is the SURPASS-2 comparison presented in a way that makes plain which semaglutide dose was compared, given that the comparator dose is the most frequently misreported feature of that trial?
  3. Does the analytical section give a reader enough to interpret a certificate for a dual agonist whose related substances are not separable by a single ultraviolet purity determination?

§1.3How a submission is handled

  • Every submission is signed. The Institute publishes no anonymous submission.
  • Every submission carries a declared interest. A declaration of no interest is itself a declaration and is recorded as one. A declaration is not a disqualification and the Institute has never given a submission less weight on that ground.
  • A submission from an employee of a marketing-authorisation holder is identified as an industry submission on its face, following a unanimous consultation on the conflicts policy.
  • Every submission receives a secretariat response and a disposition. Submissions that are not accepted remain published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.
  • There is no voting, no reputation score, no reply thread and no editing after receipt.

§1.4Outcome

The monograph was amended before ratification. The comparator dose in the SURPASS-2 row is now stated in the row itself rather than in a footnote, and the analytical section carries an explicit statement of what a single purity figure does not establish for this compound.

The disposition table, listing each submission with its disposition and the resulting amendment, is at §3.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.