Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Methodological standard · §6

CEI-MS-10 — worked example

A worked calculation, and an illustrative mass balance showing what a purity figure alone does not establish.

Document identifier
CEI-MS-10/6
Series
Methodological standard
Version
1.2
Published
31 May 2024
Last reviewed
31 Jul 2025
Next review
31 Jul 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.meth.9
Certainty
High
Cycle
2024 Q2
Category
Content

§6Worked example

§6.1Worked example — the theoretical maximum for a small polybasic peptide

  1. Consider a tripeptide of molecular mass 342.44 Da with two protonatable sites: one lysine side-chain amine and the N-terminal amine.
  2. Trifluoroacetic acid has a molecular mass of 114.02 Da. Two trifluoroacetate counter-ions add 2 × 114.02 = 228.04 Da.
  3. Total salt mass = 342.44 + 228.04 = 570.48 Da.
  4. Counter-ion mass fraction = 228.04 ÷ 570.48 = 39.97 %, that is approximately 40 % of the mass of the di-trifluoroacetate salt is counter-ion.
  5. Maximum possible peptide content for this salt form is therefore about 60 %.
  6. A certificate for this peptide reporting 99 % purity and, separately, an implied peptide content near 100 % is not describing a very pure preparation; it is describing a determination that was not performed. Conversely a peptide content of 62 % for this compound is entirely normal and is not evidence of adulteration.
  7. Exchanging to acetate (60.05 Da) reduces the counter-ion fraction to 2 × 60.05 ÷ (342.44 + 120.10) = 25.9 %, raising maximum peptide content to about 74 %. The salt form therefore changes the label arithmetic substantially and must be stated.

§6.2Illustrative mass balance

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version, 1 November 2023. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.