Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §3

GHK-Cu — clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes with certainty ratings, contributing trials and the reasoning for each rating.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-033/3
Series
Compound monograph
Version
3.0
Published
08 Jan 2026
Last reviewed
08 Jan 2026
Next review
08 Jan 2028
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.33
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2026 Q1

§3Clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes for GHK-CuPoint estimates with confidence intervals for each contributing study, plotted against the line of no effect.0.00.20.40.60.81.0Standardised direction and relative magnitude of the recorded effectIndicationEffect as recordedWound healing2 trials · LowSmall controlled dermatological studies…Ageing0 trials · Very lowNo randomised human evidence for any…
Moderate or high certaintyLow or very low certainty
Figure 3. Illustrative. Assessed outcomes plotted on a common standardised axis so that direction and relative magnitude can be compared at a glance. The estimates are not on a common natural scale and the intervals are the Institute's standardised representation of the reported precision, not the published confidence intervals. Published intervals appear in the per-indication extracts and in the text below.

§3.1Cutaneous wound healing and tissue repair

Anchor outcome. Time to complete closure.

Effect as recorded. Small controlled dermatological studies report improvements in skin roughness, wrinkle depth and collagen density with topical application over 12 weeks; small samples; instrument-based endpoints.[1,2]

Certainty. Low certainty The topical dermatological evidence is the strongest in this compound's file. It is nonetheless small-sample, mostly industry-conducted, and uses surrogate instrument endpoints.

Contributing trials. GHKCU-TOPICAL-1 · GHKCU-TOPICAL-2. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for cutaneous wound healing and tissue repair · Indication assessment

§3.2Biological ageing and healthspan endpoints

Anchor outcome. Epigenetic age acceleration.

Effect as recorded. No randomised human evidence for any systemic ageing endpoint; —.[2,3]

Certainty. Very low certainty The declining-with-age plasma concentration is an observation, not evidence of an intervention effect.

Contributing trials. None identified. The rating reflects an absence of controlled evidence rather than conflicting evidence.

Full evidence extract for biological ageing and healthspan endpoints · Indication assessment

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Pickart L, Margolina A. Regenerative and protective actions of the GHK-Cu peptide in the light of the new gene data. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018;19(7):1987. doi:10.3390/ijms19071987 · PMID 29986520
  2. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089
  3. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨788⟩ Particulate Matter in Injections. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.