Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · Incretin receptor agonists

Maridebart cafraglutide — compound monograph

GIP receptor antagonist and GLP-1 receptor agonist conjugate (antibody–peptide). Phase 3. The Institute assesses 2 outcomes for this compound and grades the strongest at low certainty.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-018
Series
Compound monograph
Version
3.3
Published
19 Jan 2025
Last reviewed
19 May 2025
Next review
19 May 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.18
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2025 Q1

§1Identification and status

§1.1Nomenclature

Preferred name
Maridebart cafraglutide
Compound class
GIP receptor antagonist and GLP-1 receptor agonist conjugate (antibody–peptide)
Assessment series
Incretin receptor agonists
Synonyms and codes
AMG 133 · MariTide · maridebart cafraglutide (INN)
Route as evaluated
Subcutaneous, monthly or less frequently

§1.2Chemistry

Chemical identifiers are reproduced where they are public. Where a structure has not been published the monograph records not disclosed rather than constructing one.[1]

CAS registry number
not assigned in public records
Molecular formula
not applicable (antibody conjugate)
Average mass
≈150,000 Da (monoclonal antibody scaffold with conjugated peptides)
Monoisotopic mass
not applicable
ATC classification
not assigned

§1.3Sequence and structural notes

A fully human monoclonal anti-GIP-receptor antibody with two GLP-1 receptor agonist peptides site-specifically conjugated

This compound is pharmacologically the mirror image of tirzepatide at the GIP receptor: it antagonises rather than agonises GIPR while agonising GLP-1R. That two opposite GIP strategies both produce weight loss is one of the more striking unresolved questions in incretin pharmacology, and the Institute treats it as such rather than adopting either mechanistic account.

§1.4Assessment status

The Institute assesses Maridebart cafraglutide across 2 indications and grades the strongest of them at low certainty. In confirmatory clinical development; no marketing authorisation.

Distribution of certainty ratingsShare of assessed outcomes at each certainty level.2assessed outcomes
HighModerateLowVery low
Figure 1. Distribution of certainty ratings across the 2 outcomes the Institute assesses for Maridebart cafraglutide. A rating attaches to a specific population, comparator and outcome and does not transfer between them.

Table 1. Assessed outcomes for Maridebart cafraglutide, ordered by certainty. Each row links to the per-indication evidence extract.

IndicationEffect as recordedCertaintyTrials
Obesity and overweight in adults−16.2 % body weight at 52 weeks at the highest dose in phase 2 versus −2.5 % with placeboLow2
Type 2 diabetes mellitus−2.2 % HbA1c reported at 52 weeks in phase 2Low1
Effects are reproduced as the contributing trials reported them. Where a confidence interval is held it appears on the per-indication extract rather than in this summary table.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.