Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · §5

Bacterial endotoxin in research-supply peptide presentations — amendment log

Every change made since protocol registration, with its date and reason.

Document identifier
CEI-ES-027/5
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
3.3
Published
05 Jun 2025
Last reviewed
05 Feb 2026
Next review
05 Aug 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.27
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2025 Q2
Review type
Analytical evidence review
Search executed
14 Apr 2025

§5Amendment log

Every change made to this review after protocol registration is recorded below with its date and its reason. A change that is not in this log did not happen. The Institute publishes the log in full, including changes that did not alter a conclusion, because a reader cannot judge which changes matter unless all of them are visible.

§5.1Amendment log

Table 9. Amendments to this review since protocol registration.

DateVersionAmendmentRecord
17 Feb 20250.1Protocol registeredThe review protocol was registered with the Institute’s secretariat before the search was executed. No change to the review question was made after registration.
10 May 20252.1Search re-runThe search was re-run to the current cycle date. Newly identified records were screened against the registered criteria without modification of those criteria.
16 Sep 20253.2Certainty rating revisedThe certainty rating for one outcome was revised following the addition of a contributing study. The rationale is recorded in the certainty assessment section.
31 Dec 20253.3Analysis method changedThe pooling method was changed from a fixed-effect to a random-effects model following observation of between-study heterogeneity exceeding the pre-specified threshold.
01 Jun 20263.0Analysis method changedThe pooling method was changed from a fixed-effect to a random-effects model following observation of between-study heterogeneity exceeding the pre-specified threshold.
Current version 3.3, ratified in the 2025 Q2 assessment cycle.

§5.2Clinical study report requests

Table 10. Clinical study reports requested for the contributing trials, and the outcome of each request. Refusals are recorded because a review that does not record them presents the sponsor's disclosure decision as the Institute's own.

TrialRequestedOutcome
ACHIEVE-103 Apr 2025Refused
ACHIEVE-231 Mar 2025Supplied on request
ATTAIN-113 Feb 2025Redirected to a data-access portal
ATTAIN-212 Feb 2025No response
ECNO-PH3-CN-OBESITY29 Jan 2025Refused
ECNO-PH3-CN-T2D10 Feb 2025Supplied on request
ESSENCE31 Mar 2025Refused
EXENATIDE-GE-PD23 Mar 2025Supplied on request

§5.3Superseded versions

Superseded versions of this review remain published at a stable address, are marked as superseded, and link forward to the current version. The current version links back to each of them. That practice was adopted following a submission that a document cited in the literature must remain retrievable in the form in which it was cited; the reasoning is published on the corrections policy disposition page.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨85⟩ Bacterial Endotoxins Test. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.