Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · Safety review

The rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human relevance

What is the evidence that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism increases the risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma in humans?

Document identifier
CEI-ES-021
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
1.3
Published
23 Feb 2024
Last reviewed
23 Aug 2024
Next review
23 Feb 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.21
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2024 Q1
Review type
Safety review
Search executed
16 Jan 2024

§1Abstract

§1.1Review question

What is the evidence that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism increases the risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma in humans?

§1.2PICO frame

Table 1. The registered PICO frame. Any change made after protocol registration is recorded in the amendment log at §5 and is identified there as post hoc.

ElementAs registered
PopulationHumans exposed to a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.
InterventionAny agent in the class.
ComparatorNon-exposure.
OutcomesMedullary thyroid carcinoma; calcitonin elevation; thyroid C-cell hyperplasia.

§1.3Method in brief

A review of harms, in which the absence of an event in a trial of conventional size is treated as uninformative rather than as reassurance. The protocol was registered with the Institute's secretariat before the search was executed. The search was run on 16 January 2024 across 8 sources and is reproduced in full at §2. Screening, extraction and certainty assessment were performed independently by two members of the secretariat with disagreement resolved by a third.

§1.4Conclusion

Low certainty evidence bears on this question. The rodent finding that motivates the boxed warning is reproducible and dose-dependent; the density of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors on rodent thyroid C cells substantially exceeds that in humans, which provides a mechanistic reason to expect the finding not to transfer. Human evidence consists of calcitonin monitoring within the trial programmes, which has not shown a consistent signal, and of pharmacovigilance analyses, which are subject to notoriety bias for a warned-of event. The Institute concludes that the human relevance is not established in either direction, and that the trials are too short and too small to establish it for a cancer with this latency and incidence.

The conclusion rests on 24 contributing studies, listed with their extracted data at §3 and summarised outcome by outcome at §4.

§1.5Limitations

§1.6Consultation

This review was released for public comment before ratification. Draft safety review: the rodent thyroid C-cell signal and its human relevance received 16 submissions. Amendments arising are recorded in the amendment log and are traceable to a numbered submission.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.