Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 23

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

735 documents · page 23 of 25

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/004Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Lorcan Whitmarsh-ObiDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/005Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Yaa KettlewellStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/008Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Ludmila TollemacheAn indirect comparison is presented without an assessment of transitivity
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/009Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Liesbeth Zaleski-MbekiThe comparator was given at a dose below the one in general use
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/010Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Yusuf Whitmarsh-ObiOne trial appears to be included twice under two publications
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/011Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Ivo QuintanilhaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/014Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaIvo MountstephenThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/016Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-COA-COMPLETE/001Draft synthesis: Completeness of certificates of analysis in the…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-COA-COMPLETE/006Draft synthesis: Completeness of certificates of analysis in the…Dr Xenia Nyquist-ObioraTime between manufacture and analysis is not accounted for
DRAFT-COA-COMPLETE/008Draft synthesis: Completeness of certificates of analysis in the…Dr Evander Ashworth-DanquahThe same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/004Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Dr Ivo QuintanilhaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/006Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/011Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Dr Yaa KettlewellA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/012Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Quentin Whitmarsh-ObiThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/013Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaThe sampling frame of each contributing survey is not reported
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/014Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergThe conclusion is stated more strongly than the certainty rating supports
DRAFT-COUNTERION-C/016Draft synthesis: Counter-ion content and its effect on delivered…Dr Quentin ZimmerthalResults obtained by different methods are pooled without recording the method
DRAFT-BPC-157-HUMA/001Draft synthesis: Human evidence for BPC-157Dr Oisín RautavaaraA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/002Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Dr Oisín RautavaaraIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/003Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Dr Lorcan Whitmarsh-ObiThe comparator was given at a dose below the one in general use
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/004Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/005Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Stellan Cholmondeley-AdeThe search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/006Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Dr Yusuf Whitmarsh-ObiResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/007Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Anselm MountstephenThe review does not say when it will be updated or what would trigger an update
DRAFT-GH-SECRETAGO/008Draft synthesis: Clinical evidence for growth-hormone secretagogues…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunOverlapping primary studies across included reviews are counted more than once
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/001Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Bertrand Ollerenshaw industryTwo factual descriptions of the sponsor's programme are inaccurate
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/005Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Dr Lorcan TrelawneyEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/006Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Dr Henrike JastrzębskaThe comparator was given at a dose below the one in general use
DRAFT-RUSSIAN-REGI/009Draft synthesis: Nationally registered neuropeptides and the…Dr Oisín RautavaaraOverlapping primary studies across included reviews are counted more than once

page 23 of 25

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.