Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 22

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

735 documents · page 22 of 25

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/015Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Dr Evander Whitmarsh-ObiQuantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced them
DRAFT-POORLY-RETAI/016Draft standard CEI-MS-19: Purity determination for peptides not…Stellan Cholmondeley-AdeA determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under
DRAFT-PHOTOSTABILI/004Draft standard CEI-MS-20: Photostability assessment of…Dr Xenia Nyquist-ObioraA cycle is not defined and the rate of thaw is not controlled
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/002Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-DUAL-VS-SING/007Draft synthesis: Dual and triple incretin receptor agonists compared…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/002Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Odalys Thorsby-NakamuraResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/008Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/009Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Zdenka XimenesEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/010Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Eamon ImmelmannAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/011Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Theodora IngelbrechtDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-INCRETIN-CAR/013Draft synthesis: Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1…Dr Oisín RautavaaraThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/003Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Evander Whitmarsh-ObiAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/005Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Adaeze Underhill-OkaforAttrition is assessed in the risk-of-bias domains and not reported as a number
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/007Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Thaddeus Isaksen-BalogunStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/008Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/009Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Anselm MountstephenThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-GASTROINTEST/011Draft synthesis: Gastrointestinal adverse events with incretin…Dr Jozef Brandvold-AchterbergAbsence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/002Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/006Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Marisol Dunmore-EkpoRegistered trials that never reported are not counted anywhere in the review
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/007Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Quentin ZimmerthalAnalytical surveys are treated as evidence about suppliers when they establish only what was in a…
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/008Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunStudies using different outcome definitions are pooled into one estimate
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/009Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Melisande Thorsby-NakamuraQuantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced them
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/013Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Eamon Sandringham-AduThe search strategy as published cannot be re-run
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/014Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Lorcan Zaleski-MbekiEfficacy outcomes are rated for certainty and harms are not
DRAFT-ORAL-VS-INJE/015Draft synthesis: Oral compared with injectable presentations of…Dr Oisín RautavaaraA funnel plot is presented for a set too small to interpret it
DRAFT-RENAL-OUTCOM/006Draft synthesis: Kidney outcomes with incretin receptor agonists in…Dr Oisín RautavaaraIntention-to-treat and efficacy-estimand results are combined without distinction
DRAFT-RENAL-OUTCOM/010Draft synthesis: Kidney outcomes with incretin receptor agonists in…Dr Liesbeth Zaleski-MbekiDoses differing several-fold are pooled without examining dose-response
DRAFT-RENAL-OUTCOM/011Draft synthesis: Kidney outcomes with incretin receptor agonists in…Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaRisk-of-bias judgements are reported as an overall rating without the domains
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/001Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunThe timepoint at which each outcome was extracted was chosen after the data were seen
DRAFT-SLEEP-APNOEA/003Draft synthesis: Weight-reducing agents for obstructive sleep apnoeaDr Adaeze Underhill-OkaforResults at materially different follow-up durations are pooled

page 22 of 25

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.