Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · §3

Draft monograph: LL-37 — disposition

The disposition of every submission and the amendments that resulted.

Document identifier
CEI-CP-063/3
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
05 Jul 2024
Last reviewed
05 Jul 2024
Next review
05 Jul 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.63
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2024 Q2
Window
16 Apr 2024 – 11 Jun 2024
Status
Closed
Submissions
6

§3Disposition and amendments

§3.1Disposition table

Table 1. Every submission with its disposition. Each row links to the submission in full.

ReferenceRespondentPoint raisedDisposition
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/001Vittoria YlönenThe monograph should not describe how the compound is supplied outside a regulated routeNoted, no amendment
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/002Dr Theodora IngelbrechtThe document should state what a reader ought to doNot accepted
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/003Dr Lorcan UttridgeAnti-drug antibody data are omittedAccepted in part
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/004Dr Matthias Whitmarsh-ObiNothing is said about impaired renal or hepatic clearanceAccepted
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/005Dr Quentin ZimmerthalThe monograph does not tell a reader that two vials of the same compound may not contain the same thingAccepted
DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/006Dr Evander Whitmarsh-ObiQuantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced themAccepted
6 submissions in total.

§3.2Summary by disposition

Table 2. Counts by disposition, with the meaning of each.

DispositionCountMeaning
Accepted3The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Accepted in part1Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Noted, no amendment1The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.
Not accepted1The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

§3.3Resulting amendments

  1. Anti-drug antibody data are omitted — arising from DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/003. Anti-drug antibody incidence and any reported association with loss of effect are now reported where measured, and recorded as not measured where the contributing trials did not assess them.
  2. Nothing is said about impaired renal or hepatic clearance — arising from DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/004. The pharmacokinetic table now carries renal and hepatic rows in every monograph, populated with the study where one exists and with an explicit statement of absence where none does.
  3. The monograph does not tell a reader that two vials of the same compound may not contain the same… — arising from DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/005. A standing paragraph now appears at the head of §8 in every monograph, stating that a determination applies to the lot measured and that a label mass is not a determination.
  4. Quantitative claims are reproduced without the method that produced them — arising from DRAFT-LL-37-MONOGR/006. Every quantitative claim now carries the determination that produced it at the point of use, and figures obtained by non-comparable methods are no longer presented in the same row or sentence.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.