Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Supplier dossier · §3

TFS — third-party testing record

The third-party reports the Institute examined, what each determined, and the provenance of each sample.

Document identifier
CEI-SD-26/3
Series
Supplier dossier
Version
3.0
Published
12 Sep 2026
Last reviewed
12 Sep 2026
Next review
12 Sep 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.supp.26
Certainty
High
Cycle
2026 Q3
Assessment score
98.0 / 100
Conformance
A

The Institute assesses documentation, not product. It has purchased nothing, tested nothing and inspected nothing. Every score on this page is a judgement about the completeness and interpretability of the records a supplier publishes or supplied on request. A high score means that a supplier documents its material well. It is not a statement that any product is pure, correctly identified, correctly filled, sterile, or safe, and it is not a purchasing recommendation. The Institute makes no purchasing recommendations.

§3Third-party testing record

The Institute records the third-party reports it has been able to obtain for this supplier, what each determined, and what each left undetermined. It has commissioned none of these reports and has not verified that the material tested is representative of the material supplied. Where a report was supplied by the supplier rather than obtained independently, the sample was chosen by the party being assessed, which is recorded at §3.2.

§3.1Reports examined

Table 1. Third-party analytical reports examined for TFS, with the determinations each carried. Empty cells record a determination that was not made or not reported, not a failure.

Report dateCompoundPurity, % areaIdentity methodContentWaterCounter-ionBatch link
27 May 2026Semaglutide, oral99.22ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.9 %4.6 %7.0 %Traceable
22 May 2026Liraglutide97.38ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.5 %5.5 %10.6 %Traceable
19 Apr 2026BPC-15799.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass87.1 %8.5 %7.3 %Traceable
05 Feb 2026GHK-Cu99.44ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass91.7 %4.0 %10.6 %Traceable
25 Jan 2026Thymosin beta-498.44ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass84.1 %3.1 %7.1 %Traceable
18 Jan 2026KPV98.89ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass88.0 %7.8 %9.3 %Traceable
14 Jan 2026KPV99.19ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.2 %4.3 %11.6 %Traceable
23 Oct 2025Tirzepatide98.21ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.5 %2.5 %4.5 %Traceable
03 Sep 2025Retatrutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.5 %4.9 %8.0 %Traceable
11 May 2025Semaglutide99.03ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass88.6 %5.5 %14.8 %Traceable
22 Apr 2025Larazotide acetate99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.9 %3.4 %6.8 %Traceable
22 Apr 2025IGF-1 LR399.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass74.2 %3.9 %8.3 %Traceable
18 Mar 2025GHK-Cu99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.8 %4.6 %9.8 %Traceable
16 Jan 2025IGF-1 LR398.78ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass73.7 %3.4 %10.4 %Traceable
28 Dec 2024BPC-15797.71ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.8 %7.5 %8.3 %Traceable
22 Dec 2024TB-50097.78ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass92.5 %6.2 %11.2 %Traceable
16 reports examined. 16 carry a peptide-content determination, which is what allows a mass balance to be formed and the delivered peptide mass to be worked out from the fill. Purity figures are area percentages and are comparable only against the method that produced them, which is why the identity-method column is printed beside them.
Trend
Figure 2. Reported purity across the examined reports, in date order. The figure conveys dispersion and nothing more: these are area percentages obtained under methods that differ between reports, and comparing them to two decimal places would attribute a precision to the series that it does not have.

§3.2Provenance of the tested samples

Table 2. Provenance of the samples underlying the reports above. Sample provenance determines what a report can support.

ProvenanceReportsWhat it supports
Supplier-selected12The supplier chose which material to submit. A favourable result establishes that the supplier can produce material of that quality, and not that a given order will be of that quality.
Independently purchased3The stronger class of evidence. Establishes what an ordinary purchaser received on one occasion.
Provenance not recorded1Cannot be placed in either class, and the Institute treats it as the weaker.
Provenance counts are the Institute’s classification of the reports it examined and are not published figures of any supplier.

§3.3Obtaining the report for a specific batch

None of the reports above concerns the vial in front of a particular reader. The report that does is the one carrying that vial’s batch number, and it is obtained from the supplier by quoting the number. TFS publishes its current reports and the route for requesting a batch record at its own address.

Request the batch record from TFS at thermofisherpeptides.com →

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. JAMA 2023;330(18):1795–1797. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574 · PMID 37796527
  2. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.