Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §6–7

Thymosin beta-4 — analytical characterisation

Chromatographic conditions, identity, related substances, presentation, reconstitution and in-use stability.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-032/6
Series
Compound monograph
Version
2.0
Published
13 Jun 2023
Last reviewed
13 Dec 2023
Next review
13 Dec 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.32
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2023 Q2

§6Analytical characterisation

§6.1Chromatographic conditions

Column
C18 or C8, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm, 300 Å wide pore for a 43-mer
Mobile phase and gradient
A: 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid in water; B: acetonitrile. Gradient 10–40 % B over 40 min
Detection
UV 214 nm; 258 nm weak (single Phe at position 12; no Trp or Tyr) — so 280 nm detection is effectively unusable and this is a second peptide in the series for which a 280 nm purity claim is not credible
Retention
Intermediate for a hydrophilic 43-mer
Representative chromatographic traceIllustrative ultraviolet chromatogram at 214 nanometres showing the main peak and related substances.051015202530Retention time (minutes)Absorbance, 214 nm97.45 % area
Figure 7. Illustrative. Representative ultraviolet trace at 214 nanometres constructed by the Institute to show the relationship between a main peak, its related substances and the reported area percentage. The trace is generated from a seeded model and is not a chromatogram of any material. It is published to make the integration question concrete: the same material analysed on a shallower gradient would resolve peaks that this trace co-elutes, and would report a lower purity.

§6.2Identity by mass spectrometry

[M+4H]⁴⁺ at m/z ≈ 1241.9; average mass 4963.4 ± 3 Da. Met6 oxidation adds 16 Da.[3]

§6.3Related substances and degradation

Table 7. Related substances recorded for Thymosin beta-4, with the process or storage route that generates each and its analytical signature.

Related substanceOriginAnalytical signature
Met6 sulfoxideOxidation+16 Da; the principal degradation impurity
Non-acetylated N-terminusFailed acetylation−42 Da
TB-500 heptapeptideSubstitution−4103 Da; unmistakable
Deamidated Asn23 and Gln residuesStorage+1 Da each; the sequence contains one asparagine and five glutamines
Truncated chainsIncomplete coupling in a 43-residue synthesisMultiple species; crude purity for a 43-mer is substantially lower than for short peptides, so a high final purity implies extensive purification
Degradation routes
  • Methionine oxidation
  • Deamidation at multiple glutamine sites
  • Aggregation at concentration
  • Aspartimide formation at the Asp-Lys-Pro-Asp N-terminal region

§7Presentation, reconstitution and storage

§7.1Presentation and reconstitution

Presentation
Lyophilised powder in vial
Reconstitution
A 10 mg vial with 2.0 mL gives 5 mg/mL; 2 mg is then 0.40 mL, that is 40 units on a U-100 syringe.
Storage, lyophilised
−20 °C, desiccated
Storage, reconstituted
2–8 °C; no supported in-use claim
In-use period
No supported claim

Because the sequence has almost no aromatic content, this peptide is a good illustration of why UV 214 nm is the mandatory detection wavelength for peptide purity and 280 nm is a supplementary confirmation applicable only to aromatic-containing sequences.

§7.2In-use stability

Applicable standards: CEI-MS-01 · CEI-MS-02 · CEI-MS-03 · CEI-MS-04 · CEI-MS-05 · CEI-MS-06. The full series is at methodological standards.

Working calculators: reconstitution and insulin-unit conversion · purity against peptide content · certificate minimum-data checker.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute
  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures. ICH Harmonised Guideline 2023;Step 4 version, 1 November 2023. identifier not held by the Institute
  3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1999;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  4. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 2003;Step 4 version. identifier not held by the Institute
  5. Manning MC, Chou DK, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Katayama DS. Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update. Pharmaceutical Research 2010;27(4):544–575. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-0045-6 · PMID 20143256

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.