Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Evidence synthesis · §3

Distribution of access to obesity pharmacotherapy — included and excluded studies

The included-studies table with extracted data, the exclusions with reasons, and the risk-of-bias judgements.

Document identifier
CEI-ES-035/3
Series
Evidence synthesis
Version
1.3
Published
05 Nov 2024
Last reviewed
05 Mar 2025
Next review
05 Sep 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.syn.35
Certainty
Low
Cycle
2024 Q4
Review type
Methodological review
Search executed
11 Sep 2024

§3Included and excluded studies

Every study contributing to this review is listed below with the data extracted from it. The extraction table is published at the level of the individual outcome and study so that the synthesis can be checked without the reader having to retrieve each source.

§3.1Included studies

Table 4. Included studies with the characteristics extracted from each.

StudyDesignRandomisedDurationAnchor outcome as reportedYear
ATTAIN-1OrforglipronRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled72 weeksThe Institute holds a headline result indicating a weight effect intermediate between the injectable single agonists and placebo, and awaits the full…2025
ATTAIN-2OrforglipronRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled72 weeksno result held2025
ECNO-PH3-CN-OBESITYEcnoglutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled66448 weeksMean change −13.2 % at 2.4 mg versus −0.5 % with placebo2025
GLORY-1MazdutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled61048 weeksMean change −14.0 % at 6 mg versus +0.3 % with placebo2025
REDEFINE-1CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled3,41768 weeksMean change −22.7 % versus −2.3 % with placebo2025
REDEFINE-2CagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled1,20668 weeksMean change −15.7 % versus −3.1 % with placebo2025
SURMOUNT-5TirzepatideRandomised, open-label, active-controlled75172 weeksMean change −20.2 % with tirzepatide versus −13.7 % with semaglutide2025
SURMOUNT-KOATirzepatideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled68 weeksImprovement relative to placebo. The Institute records that pain improvement in a weight-loss trial cannot be attributed to a direct joint effect2025
MARITIDE-PH2-OBESITYMaridebart cafraglutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled59252 weeksMean change of approximately −20 % at the highest dose without a weight plateau at 52 weeks2024
PETRE-PH1BPetrelintidePhase 1 ascending dose16 weeksWeight reduction of approximately 8.6 % at 16 weeks in a phase 1b setting2024
REIMAGINE-1AmycretinPhase 1 ascending dose125Up to 36 weeksExploratory weight reduction of approximately 13 % at 12 weeks with the subcutaneous presentation. The Institute treats an exploratory endpoint in a phase 1…2024
SUMMITTirzepatideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled731Median 104 weeksHazard ratio 0.62 (95 % CI 0.41 to 0.95) for the composite; clinical summary score difference 6.9 points (95 % CI 3.3 to 10.6)2024
SURMOUNT-4TirzepatideRandomised withdrawal67052 weeks after a 36-week open-label lead-inContinued treatment −5.5 % versus +14.0 % after switching to placebo2024
SURMOUNT-OSA-1TirzepatideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled52 weeksSubstantial reduction in the apnoea–hypopnoea index relative to placebo; the Institute reproduces the pooled programme estimate rather than a per-trial figure2024
SURMOUNT-OSA-2TirzepatideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled52 weeksDirectionally consistent with the companion trial2024
SURVO-PH2-OBESITYSurvodutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled38746 weeksMean change −18.7 % at the highest dose versus −1.8 % with placebo2024
CAGRI-SEMA-PH2-T2DCagriSema (cagrilintide with semaglutide)Randomised, double-blind, active-controlled9232 weeksWeight change of approximately −15.6 % in the combination arm; the small sample is the reason the Institute treats the phase 2 estimate as hypothesis-generating2023
DANU-PH2B-OBESITYDanuglipronRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled60532 weeksDose-dependent weight reduction accompanied by discontinuation rates above 50 % in some arms; development in obesity was subsequently discontinued2023
MAZ-PH2-OBESITYMazdutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled24824 weeksMean change up to −15.4 % at the highest dose in a Chinese population2023
OASIS-1Semaglutide, oralRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled66768 weeksMean change −15.1 % versus −2.4 % with placebo2023
ORFO-PH2-OBESITYOrforglipronRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled27236 weeksMean change up to −14.7 % versus −2.3 % with placebo2023
RETA-PH2-OBESITYRetatrutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled33848 weeksMean change −24.2 % at 12 mg versus −2.1 % with placebo2023
SELECTSemaglutideEvent-driven cardiovascular outcome trial17,604Mean 39.8 monthsHazard ratio 0.80 (95 % CI 0.72 to 0.90); 6.5 % versus 8.0 %2023
STEP-HFpEFSemaglutideRandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled52952 weeksClinical summary score improved 16.6 points versus 8.7 points with placebo; estimated difference 7.8 points (95 % CI 4.8 to 10.9)2023
24 included studies. Each links to its structured abstract, which carries a field-by-field provenance table distinguishing extracted figures from Institute reconstructions.

Contributing participants across studies reporting a randomised total: 29,508. Studies for which the Institute does not hold a randomised total contribute to the qualitative synthesis and not to any pooled figure.

§3.2Excluded at full text, with reasons

Table 5. Reports excluded at full text, by reason. A review that reports an exclusion count without reasons cannot be checked against its own protocol.

Reason for exclusionReports
Not a randomised comparison18
Population outside the review question20
Intervention outside the review question14
Comparator not eligible15
No eligible outcome reported4
Duplicate report of an included study5
Conference abstract without extractable data12
Retracted or subject to an expression of concern15
72 reports excluded at full text in total.

§3.3Risk of bias across included studies

Table 6. Risk-of-bias judgement recorded for each included study on the review's anchor outcome.

StudyRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication bias
ATTAIN-1LowLowLowLowSome
ATTAIN-2LowLowHighLowLow
ECNO-PH3-CN-OBESITYSomeSomeLowLowLow
GLORY-1LowSomeLowLowLow
REDEFINE-1LowSomeLowLowLow
REDEFINE-2LowLowSomeLowLow
SURMOUNT-5LowLowLowLowLow
SURMOUNT-KOASomeLowSomeLowLow
MARITIDE-PH2-OBESITYLowLowHighLowLow
PETRE-PH1BLowLowLowHighLow
REIMAGINE-1LowLowLowSomeSome
SUMMITLowSomeLowLowLow
SURMOUNT-4LowLowLowLowLow
SURMOUNT-OSA-1LowLowLowLowLow
Judgements are the Institute's own and are recorded per outcome. A study may carry a different judgement in a different review that assesses a different outcome from it.
Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.