Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Consultation record

Submissions accepted in part — page 5

Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.

Submissions

390 documents · page 5 of 13

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

ReferenceConsultationRespondentPoint raised
DRAFT-MELANOCORTIN/002Draft scoping review: melanocortin receptor agonistsDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunThe axis of the forest plot exaggerates a small difference
DRAFT-MELANOCORTIN/009Draft scoping review: melanocortin receptor agonistsAnselm MountstephenReferences should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/003Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesThaddeus Isaksen-BalogunThe conditions for upgrading observational evidence are too permissive
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/007Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesDr Melisande Kirkpatrick-OlaPreprints and conference abstracts are excluded categorically
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/009Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesAnselm MountstephenThe database set omits sources relevant to the compounds in scope
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/012Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesDr Ivo QuintanilhaAutomated assistance in screening should be disclosed and validated
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/013Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesDr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunNo information-size criterion is applied before an interval is judged
DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/019Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis seriesDr Odalys Thorsby-NakamuraNon-randomised evidence is admitted for harms and excluded for benefits without a stated basis
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/003Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsVittoria YlönenA declaration is made on appointment and never refreshed
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/006Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsMs Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafA four-week window is too short for a respondent without institutional support
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/010Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsDr Georgiana MountstephenFunding should not be accepted from any party the Institute assesses
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/011Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsProfessor Bartolomeu Nkosi-LindegaardA party criticised in an assessment should have a right of reply
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/014Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsDr Rurik Haverkamp-DialloThe materiality threshold for a declarable holding is set too high
DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/016Draft print and archival format for Institute documentsQuentin Whitmarsh-ObiReferences should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/001Draft certainty indexEamon Sandringham-AduReferences should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/003Draft certainty indexDr Zdenka Nyquist-ObioraThe anchor outcome for an indication is not the outcome a decision turns on
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/004Draft certainty indexDr Marisol Dunmore-EkpoA document is split across parts at a point that separates a claim from its support
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/010Draft certainty indexYolanda Norrington-BhattThe front matter delays the reader from reaching the assessment
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/014Draft certainty indexDr Vasilisa ImmelmannThe series scope is drawn widely enough to absorb documents that belong elsewhere
DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/015Draft certainty indexDr Oisín RautavaaraPoint estimates are given without an interval
DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/002Draft monograph: amycretinDr Jolanta UttridgeStorage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests on
DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/008Draft monograph: amycretinDr Perpetua Haverkamp-Diallo industryThe monograph should reproduce the approved labelling rather than paraphrase it
DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/009Draft monograph: amycretinDr Liesbeth AchterbergAnti-drug antibody data are omitted
DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/014Draft monograph: amycretinMs Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafThe document is unreadable without specialist training
DRAFT-5-AMINO-1MQ-/005Draft monograph: 5-amino-1MQDr Zdenka Nyquist-ObioraThe preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is not
DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/004Draft monograph: AOD-9604Dr Odalys Thorsby-NakamuraTrials are described as terminated where they completed as planned
DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/009Draft monograph: AOD-9604Dr Henrike JastrzębskaThe analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies
DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/013Draft monograph: AOD-9604Dr Liesbeth Nyquist-ObioraStorage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests on
DRAFT-CAGRILINTIDE/003Draft monograph: CagrilintideDr Oisín RautavaaraPoint estimates are given without an interval
DRAFT-CAGRILINTIDE/007Draft monograph: CagrilintideDr Marisol Dunmore-EkpoTrials are described as terminated where they completed as planned

page 5 of 13

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.