Consultation record
Submissions accepted in part — page 5
Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Submissions
390 documents · page 5 of 13
Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.
| Reference | Consultation | Respondent | Point raised |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRAFT-MELANOCORTIN/002 | Draft scoping review: melanocortin receptor agonists | Dr Kolawole Isaksen-Balogun | The axis of the forest plot exaggerates a small difference |
| DRAFT-MELANOCORTIN/009 | Draft scoping review: melanocortin receptor agonists | Anselm Mountstephen | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/003 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Thaddeus Isaksen-Balogun | The conditions for upgrading observational evidence are too permissive |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/007 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Dr Melisande Kirkpatrick-Ola | Preprints and conference abstracts are excluded categorically |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/009 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Anselm Mountstephen | The database set omits sources relevant to the compounds in scope |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/012 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Dr Ivo Quintanilha | Automated assistance in screening should be disclosed and validated |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/013 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Dr Kolawole Isaksen-Balogun | No information-size criterion is applied before an interval is judged |
| DRAFT-SEARCH-STRAT/019 | Draft search-strategy template for the synthesis series | Dr Odalys Thorsby-Nakamura | Non-randomised evidence is admitted for harms and excluded for benefits without a stated basis |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/003 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Vittoria Ylönen | A declaration is made on appointment and never refreshed |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/006 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | A four-week window is too short for a respondent without institutional support |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/010 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Dr Georgiana Mountstephen | Funding should not be accepted from any party the Institute assesses |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/011 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-Lindegaard | A party criticised in an assessment should have a right of reply |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/014 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Dr Rurik Haverkamp-Diallo | The materiality threshold for a declarable holding is set too high |
| DRAFT-PRINT-AND-AR/016 | Draft print and archival format for Institute documents | Quentin Whitmarsh-Obi | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/001 | Draft certainty index | Eamon Sandringham-Adu | References should carry a persistent identifier for every cited source |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/003 | Draft certainty index | Dr Zdenka Nyquist-Obiora | The anchor outcome for an indication is not the outcome a decision turns on |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/004 | Draft certainty index | Dr Marisol Dunmore-Ekpo | A document is split across parts at a point that separates a claim from its support |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/010 | Draft certainty index | Yolanda Norrington-Bhatt | The front matter delays the reader from reaching the assessment |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/014 | Draft certainty index | Dr Vasilisa Immelmann | The series scope is drawn widely enough to absorb documents that belong elsewhere |
| DRAFT-CERTAINTY-IN/015 | Draft certainty index | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/002 | Draft monograph: amycretin | Dr Jolanta Uttridge | Storage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests on |
| DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/008 | Draft monograph: amycretin | Dr Perpetua Haverkamp-Diallo industry | The monograph should reproduce the approved labelling rather than paraphrase it |
| DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/009 | Draft monograph: amycretin | Dr Liesbeth Achterberg | Anti-drug antibody data are omitted |
| DRAFT-AMYCRETIN-MO/014 | Draft monograph: amycretin | Ms Rhiannon Okoye-Vandergraaf | The document is unreadable without specialist training |
| DRAFT-5-AMINO-1MQ-/005 | Draft monograph: 5-amino-1MQ | Dr Zdenka Nyquist-Obiora | The preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is not |
| DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/004 | Draft monograph: AOD-9604 | Dr Odalys Thorsby-Nakamura | Trials are described as terminated where they completed as planned |
| DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/009 | Draft monograph: AOD-9604 | Dr Henrike Jastrzębska | The analytical section is longer than the clinical assessment it accompanies |
| DRAFT-AOD-9604-MON/013 | Draft monograph: AOD-9604 | Dr Liesbeth Nyquist-Obiora | Storage and reconstitution guidance is given without stating what it rests on |
| DRAFT-CAGRILINTIDE/003 | Draft monograph: Cagrilintide | Dr Oisín Rautavaara | Point estimates are given without an interval |
| DRAFT-CAGRILINTIDE/007 | Draft monograph: Cagrilintide | Dr Marisol Dunmore-Ekpo | Trials are described as terminated where they completed as planned |
page 5 of 13