Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Compound monograph · §3

AOD-9604 — clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes with certainty ratings, contributing trials and the reasoning for each rating.

Document identifier
CEI-MN-028/3
Series
Compound monograph
Version
1.0
Published
17 Sep 2025
Last reviewed
17 Sep 2025
Next review
17 Sep 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.mono.28
Certainty
Very low
Cycle
2025 Q3

§3Clinical evidence

Assessed outcomes for AOD-9604Point estimates with confidence intervals for each contributing study, plotted against the line of no effect.0.00.20.40.60.81.0Standardised direction and relative magnitude of the recorded effectIndicationEffect as recordedObesity1 trial · ModerateA 12-week phase 2b trial in 300…Knee osteoarthritis1 trial · LowA small trial in knee osteoarthritis…
Moderate or high certaintyLow or very low certainty
Figure 3. Illustrative. Assessed outcomes plotted on a common standardised axis so that direction and relative magnitude can be compared at a glance. The estimates are not on a common natural scale and the intervals are the Institute's standardised representation of the reported precision, not the published confidence intervals. Published intervals appear in the per-indication extracts and in the text below.

§3.1Obesity and overweight in adults

Anchor outcome. Percentage change in body weight from baseline.

Effect as recorded. A 12-week phase 2b trial in 300 participants did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in body weight versus placebo at any dose; negative result.[1,2]

Certainty. Moderate certainty The Institute rates the *negative* finding as moderate certainty — this is a real randomised trial with a clear null result. The evidence that the compound does not produce clinically meaningful weight loss at the doses studied is considerably stronger than any evidence that it does.

Contributing trials. AOD-PH2B-OBESITY. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for obesity and overweight in adults · Indication assessment

§3.2Knee osteoarthritis with obesity

Anchor outcome. WOMAC pain subscale.

Effect as recorded. A small trial in knee osteoarthritis reported no significant benefit on the primary endpoint; negative result.[2,3]

Certainty. Low certainty Small sample.

Contributing trials. AOD-OA-PH2. Full structured abstracts are published for each.

Full evidence extract for knee osteoarthritis with obesity · Indication assessment

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Heffernan M, Summers RJ, Thorburn A, Ogru E, Gianello R, Jiang WJ, Ng FM. The effects of human GH and its lipolytic fragment (AOD9604) on lipid metabolism following chronic treatment in obese mice and β3-AR knock-out mice. Endocrinology 2001;142(12):5182–5189. doi:10.1210/endo.142.12.8522 · PMID 11713213
  2. Thevis M, Thomas A, Schänzer W. Detecting peptidic drugs, drug candidates and analogs in sports doping: current status and future directions. Expert Review of Proteomics 2019;11(6):663–673. doi:10.1586/14789450.2014.965158
  3. D’Hondt M, Bracke N, Taevernier L, Gevaert B, Verbeke F, Wynendaele E, De Spiegeleer B. Related impurities in peptide medicines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2014;101:2–30. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.06.012 · PMID 25044089

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.