Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Supplier dossier · §3

KP — third-party testing record

The third-party reports the Institute examined, what each determined, and the provenance of each sample.

Document identifier
CEI-SD-16/3
Series
Supplier dossier
Version
2.2
Published
11 Sep 2024
Last reviewed
11 Jul 2025
Next review
11 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.supp.16
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2024 Q3
Assessment score
93.0 / 100
Conformance
A

The Institute assesses documentation, not product. It has purchased nothing, tested nothing and inspected nothing. Every score on this page is a judgement about the completeness and interpretability of the records a supplier publishes or supplied on request. A high score means that a supplier documents its material well. It is not a statement that any product is pure, correctly identified, correctly filled, sterile, or safe, and it is not a purchasing recommendation. The Institute makes no purchasing recommendations.

§3Third-party testing record

The Institute records the third-party reports it has been able to obtain for this supplier, what each determined, and what each left undetermined. It has commissioned none of these reports and has not verified that the material tested is representative of the material supplied. Where a report was supplied by the supplier rather than obtained independently, the sample was chosen by the party being assessed, which is recorded at §3.2.

§3.1Reports examined

Table 1. Third-party analytical reports examined for KP, with the determinations each carried. Empty cells record a determination that was not made or not reported, not a failure.

Report dateCompoundPurity, % areaIdentity methodContentWaterCounter-ionBatch link
28 Jun 2024Teduglutide95.70ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.6 %4.5 %5.3 %Traceable
02 Jun 2024Tesamorelin96.87ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.9 %7.0 %11.3 %Traceable
01 Jun 2024Danuglipron97.73ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.0 %5.3 %10.3 %Traceable
08 Apr 2024Mazdutide97.63ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass84.0 %4.3 %8.6 %Traceable
20 Mar 2024Survodutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.0 %6.8 %4.5 %Traceable
09 Feb 2024Exenatide98.69ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass85.7 %4.4 %7.3 %Traceable
14 Nov 2023Dulaglutide98.68ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass76.5 %4.6 %11.6 %Traceable
06 Nov 2023Orforglipron99.35ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.9 %6.8 %6.1 %Traceable
30 Oct 2023Survodutide97.97ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass90.6 %2.1 %10.1 %Traceable
08 Aug 2023Lixisenatide97.97ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.7 %1.9 %9.9 %Traceable
23 Jul 2023Maridebart cafraglutide98.67ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass82.8 %4.5 %10.3 %Traceable
16 Jul 2023Danuglipron99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.7 %3.0 %6.4 %Traceable
11 Apr 2023Liraglutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass79.6 %4.1 %7.7 %Traceable
11 Apr 2023Lixisenatide96.93ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.2 %7.7 %7.9 %Traceable
03 Apr 2023Retatrutide96.65ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass76.9 %4.4 %9.2 %Traceable
22 Mar 2023Sermorelin97.92ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass87.5 %4.0 %7.3 %Traceable
13 Feb 2023Orforglipron97.27ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.4 %2.0 %6.7 %Traceable
17 Dec 2022Ecnoglutide98.40ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass85.0 %3.7 %9.4 %Traceable
18 reports examined. A purity figure without a named method indicates that chromatography was performed and little more; 0 of these reports carry no content determination and therefore do not permit a mass balance to be formed.
Trend
Figure 2. Reported purity across the examined reports, in date order. The figure conveys dispersion and nothing more: these are area percentages obtained under methods that differ between reports, and comparing them to two decimal places would attribute a precision to the series that it does not have.

§3.2Provenance of the tested samples

Table 2. Provenance of the samples underlying the reports above. Sample provenance determines what a report can support.

ProvenanceReportsWhat it supports
Supplier-selected13The supplier chose which material to submit. A favourable result establishes that the supplier can produce material of that quality, and not that a given order will be of that quality.
Independently purchased3The stronger class of evidence. Establishes what an ordinary purchaser received on one occasion.
Provenance not recorded2Cannot be placed in either class, and the Institute treats it as the weaker.
Provenance counts are the Institute’s classification of the reports it examined and are not published figures of any supplier.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. JAMA 2023;330(18):1795–1797. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574 · PMID 37796527
  2. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.