Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Supplier dossier · §3

MKM — third-party testing record

The third-party reports the Institute examined, what each determined, and the provenance of each sample.

Document identifier
CEI-SD-01/3
Series
Supplier dossier
Version
1.0
Published
28 May 2024
Last reviewed
28 Aug 2024
Next review
28 Aug 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.supp.1
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2024 Q2
Assessment score
90.0 / 100
Conformance
A

The Institute assesses documentation, not product. It has purchased nothing, tested nothing and inspected nothing. Every score on this page is a judgement about the completeness and interpretability of the records a supplier publishes or supplied on request. A high score means that a supplier documents its material well. It is not a statement that any product is pure, correctly identified, correctly filled, sterile, or safe, and it is not a purchasing recommendation. The Institute makes no purchasing recommendations.

§3Third-party testing record

The Institute records the third-party reports it has been able to obtain for this supplier, what each determined, and what each left undetermined. It has commissioned none of these reports and has not verified that the material tested is representative of the material supplied. Where a report was supplied by the supplier rather than obtained independently, the sample was chosen by the party being assessed, which is recorded at §3.2.

§3.1Reports examined

Table 1. Third-party analytical reports examined for MKM, with the determinations each carried. Empty cells record a determination that was not made or not reported, not a failure.

Report dateCompoundPurity, % areaIdentity methodContentWaterCounter-ionBatch link
08 Apr 2024Retatrutide98.17ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass84.3 %Traceable
25 Feb 2024Mazdutide97.26ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.9 %Traceable
06 Jan 2024Semaglutide, oral99.21ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.3 %Traceable
06 Jan 2024GHRP-298.36ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.6 %Traceable
13 Dec 2023Tesamorelin97.88ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass93.5 %Traceable
07 Dec 2023Thymosin beta-497.81ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass77.4 %Traceable
06 Dec 2023Liraglutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass90.3 %Traceable
17 Oct 2023Orforglipron99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.4 %Traceable
22 Sep 2023CJC-129598.36ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.6 %Traceable
18 Sep 2023Lixisenatide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.1 %Traceable
02 Sep 2023GHK-Cu97.64ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass90.4 %Traceable
20 Jul 2023Ecnoglutide99.31ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.7 %Traceable
26 Jun 2023KPV99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass79.1 %Traceable
13 Jun 2023TB-50099.15ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass92.2 %Traceable
25 May 2023Liraglutide99.45ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass74.1 %Traceable
05 May 2023Retatrutide98.64ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.6 %Traceable
05 May 2023Larazotide acetate96.82ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.2 %Traceable
10 Apr 2023Danuglipron97.71ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass77.5 %Traceable
05 Apr 2023Teduglutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass75.6 %Traceable
03 Mar 2023Semaglutide99.21ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.5 %Traceable
15 Feb 2023Tirzepatide99.49ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.9 %Traceable
02 Jan 2023Ipamorelin98.58ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass92.2 %Traceable
12 Dec 2022Survodutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass74.5 %Traceable
21 Oct 2022Maridebart cafraglutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass88.6 %Traceable
24 Sep 2022Sermorelin99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.7 %Traceable
25 reports examined. A purity figure without a named method indicates that chromatography was performed and little more; 0 of these reports carry no content determination and therefore do not permit a mass balance to be formed.
Trend
Figure 2. Reported purity across the examined reports, in date order. The figure conveys dispersion and nothing more: these are area percentages obtained under methods that differ between reports, and comparing them to two decimal places would attribute a precision to the series that it does not have.

§3.2Provenance of the tested samples

Table 2. Provenance of the samples underlying the reports above. Sample provenance determines what a report can support.

ProvenanceReportsWhat it supports
Supplier-selected18The supplier chose which material to submit. A favourable result establishes that the supplier can produce material of that quality, and not that a given order will be of that quality.
Independently purchased5The stronger class of evidence. Establishes what an ordinary purchaser received on one occasion.
Provenance not recorded2Cannot be placed in either class, and the Institute treats it as the weaker.
Provenance counts are the Institute’s classification of the reports it examined and are not published figures of any supplier.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. JAMA 2023;330(18):1795–1797. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574 · PMID 37796527
  2. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.